Tag: watch

A power reserve indicator is a complication on mechanical watches that tell the wearer how much power is left before the watch stops running. Mostly found today on automatic watches it is a sign of a watch manufacturer’s prowess.

But I would argue it is more logical that this complication be on manual wind watches instead.

Automatic watches wind themselves from the movement of your wrist, hence its name. A watch that is worn everyday will generally be still charged the next morning when you put on the watch, and thus be recharged.

Manual watches on the other hand will only be wound if the wearer does so. If he or she forgets to wind the watch for a couple of days the watch will stop running because of the lack of power and typical mechanical watch will have 40 hours of power reserve). Therefore daily wearers of automatic watches will not need to worry about power. So it does not make sense to have a power reserve on an automatic. Or at least it makes more sense to have a power reserve indicator on a manual watch.

So I scratch my head as to why watch makers do not marry the right complication with the watches’ functions.

I have had my eye on the Longines Hydroconquest GMT as my (almost) one-and-done watch.

Here is a watch which looks like a Rolex GMT-Master II, Tudor Black Bay 58 GMT, and Seiko 5 GMT, but is better. Here is why.

Rolex, Tudor and Seiko’s GMTs have 24-hour bezels, even though these watches are using dive cases. These are dive watches with GMT complications. Yet, without the dive timer bezel it is only a GMT watch, not strictly a dive watch. It could be argued that today since most people use dive computers dive watches are redundant. But not everyone can afford to use dive computers or need to use dive computers for casual recreational diving. So by replacing the dive bezel with a 24-hour bezel means the watch is useless for diving.

Of the three, only Seiko has both a 24-hour bezel and chapter ring, meaning theoretically the complication can now track three time zones instead of two as with the Rolex and Tudor.

The Hydroconquest GMT on the other hand does have a dive bezel for timing dives and a 24-hour chapter ring. This means you are able to use the watch for timing dives as well as tracking a second time zone.

Not many need to time more than two time zones. So Rolex and Tudor are fine. The Seiko is a time zone overkill since it can do three.

The Hydroconquest on the other hand can time dives and keep track of a second time zone. In other words, it’s a dive watch as well as being a GMT watch. Rolex, Tudor, and Seiko are only GMT watches in a dive watch package.

I am not saying I am going to dive with my watch. I like using timing bezels for exactly that — timing. But I also want to keep track of a second time zone (tracking time of family living around the world, for example). So the Hydroconquest is the only watch that does that. They thought about the design and redundancy of having two 24-hour indicators like the Seiko, and also the fact that the watch is essentially a dive watch designed to track 24-hour like the Rolex and Tudor. The watch is essential taking the best of all designs.

The point is, this watch is the only one that is truly a dive watch and a GMT watch … at luxury prices though.

I have had my eye on the Christopher Ward C1 Bel Canto (C01-41APT0-T00K0-VK) for a while. This is a watch with a hourly chime complication. The model I like is the black dial on a leather strap and/or the bader bracelet.

It is an elegant and distinctive watch. The only problem is I am not a formal kind of guy. I don’t dress up for work or put on a suit too often. This watch is not for jeans in my opinion. It is a dress watch. Outside of work I am in jeans or shorts.

While it is a cool watch with a cool complication ultimately I will no occasion to wear it.

Verdict: no buy, even though it is an excellent watch.