Should there be a subject?
Is there a difference between observing an external object and the internal one called the subject?
Is it here that Western philosophy fails?
Another person’s object can be a subject, and vice versa. By label of subject have we not created a subject-centric of the world when really there is no central view?
I can sympathise with OOO for this reason. But at the same time with sense as the only access to the world, we have no choice but to have a central view.