There are things.
When I say this I am more interested in the fact of knowing. I am confronted with things. I do not how I have knowledge of these things. But the fact that this the first act that makes me aware of something.
I am “thrown in” to this knowing, this act of sensing, perceiving, and conceiving without a choice. Only later through reflection that I will realise I cannot know things without actual sensation, perception, and conception.
This kind of process is specific to me being the being that I am.
signature103 
….as I said: it is a much more difficult knowledge to accept being in itself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I define “being” to mean not only animate but also inanimate things. There is not a word that adequately defines this superordinate category.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“This kind of process is specific to me being the being that I am.”
I would change it to a more challenging meaning:
“This kind of process is specific to being.”
“Me”. And “I” lessens the impact of the truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person