you just dont want
to know, when
is running fine
it doesnt matter
if the metaphorical “oil”
is just a little dirty
of food and water
i wait for my turn
along with the other
in the hospital
that are never
the stale stench
fills the space
patients reading books
not wanting to know
not wanting to wait
the ping of machines
marking time, timing
When a person dies their body (matter) remains and their mind extinguishes. That is observed. Under no circumstances does matter extinguish. It only changes. Conservation is observed. This consistency and predictability of matter is essential to my understanding (call it reason if you will). From nowhere else does my knowledge of the reality start except from the sensation, then perception and conception of it.
When I die, I will not continue as a mind or spirit but the matter will transform into something else that may or may not have a mind.
Is it 1) mind only; 2) matter only; 3) both mind and matter; 4) more than just mind and matter; or 5) neither mind nor matter?
If it is the mind then all matter needs the mind. If it is matter then all things needs matter. If it is mind and matter then all things need both mind and matter. If it it is more than mind and matter then all things need mind, matter and the unknown things. If it is neither mind nor matter then all things need some unknown thing.
The world can be explained with what we have, namely the mind and matter. But the matter seems not to need the mind to exist. Death is a prime example of the matter continuing after the mind disappears. Whether the mind and/or some other unknown exists or disappears only matter exists. The only conclusion we can draw is it is monism, and it is matter only.
Everything is in flux. (Heraclitus, 6c BCE)
Everything, without exception, is impermanent. (The Buddha, 5c BCE)
Change is the only constant. (signature103, 2018)
The world is matter and matter alone. Where is the mind situated in this world? It is a process of matter. Perception and conception are processes of matter.
Yesterday, I talked about the Avicenna’s Flying Man experiment. It seems quite a strange thought experiment. But let’s modify it and try to come up with a better conclusion.
Imagine pure space with no objects – including no you, the observer – within it. Nothing. No matter. No energy. Nada.
Even if you, by some impossible reason, can be an observer within this space – let us call you, The Insubstantial Eye – you cannot “know” space. You have no points of reference. Even if you move “through” space you will not know whether you are moving or whether you are stationary.
In other words, space is not knowable without objects. This is what I mean by space is inferred from the relationship of objects.