Orient Star and Blancpain

The 2019 Orient Star Diver is an homage to the 1953 Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. The Orient Star has given their model a clean easy-to-read look with the pill capsule shaped indices and handset. The choice of text colour helps hide three of four lines of text. Orient also added a power reserve indicator, all of these features are useful in making the time highly legible.

The Fifty Fathoms was the first watch to feature a unidirectional timing bezel (patented by Blancpain) and an automatic movement (without the need to wind the watch while diving). These two features alone make the Fifty Fathoms (300ft water resistant) an outstanding watch.

Dive watches: why are they so popular

I got myself a ISO certified dive watch this week. I now understand why they are so popular. There are, I believe, three main reasons.

Tough
Firstly, dive watches are tough. They are built to take knocks in conditions where hard things like dive tanks and rocks are a constant threat. While most well made watches are tough enough these days, a dive watch is still designed against accidental contact in the real world.

Readability
Secondly, dive watches are designed to be highly legible in the toughest of conditions, murky waters are again a constant threat for diving. That being the case they are designed to be easily read.

Quietness
Lastly, dive watches are quiet. The side benefit of waterproof casing is that it means no water gets in and so little sound gets out as well. I remember the shock I had when I tried a Swatch Sistem 51. The all plastic automatic watch and movement could be heard without bringing the watch close to my ears. Watches with less waterproofing will generally mean mechanical noise will escape from the watch as well.

These are things that every watch should be regardless of being a diver’s watch or not.

pick a landmark

life is
so much easier
when you have
a landmark
to orientate you

it may not be
anybody else’s landmark
(and it shouldn’t be)
but at least
you will know
where everybody else
is in relation to you

that is
the whole point
of choosing
a landmark

Building a philosophy

A famous fashion brand once made a commercial talking about its philosophy. It goes like this: their creations have to be simple, useful, beautiful, dependable, and durable.

To be simple is to have no more components or features than is necessary. To be useful is to serve the purpose that it was created for. To be beautiful is to balance simplicity with functionality. To be dependable is to function as intended. To be durable is to function as intended over time.

These are not bad concepts to hold at all.

Choosing an automatic watch

Men have fewer options compared to women for accessories, let alone jewelry. The watch is perhaps the one accessory that a man can express his fashion sense and tastes.

The choice of buying a watch for the moment versus buying a watch to last a lifetime shows a man’s values and qualities. A well chosen watch shows thought and conviction. It is a statement, an expression of the man.

A watch should standalone as a little piece of art but should match the wearer’s personality and lifestyle. How a man maintains a watch reflects upon how he maintains himself.

Mechanical GMT

Few people realize just what a big deal it is that Seiko brought out an automatic GMT movement last year. Not that GMT movements haven’t been around for long. They have. But that this automatic GMT cost less than USD500 that is the big deal. There are not many automatic GMTs in the USD1000-2000 let alone one sub-USD1000. So when Seiko makes one at this price point people’s antennas are going to prick up.

We are certainly going to see this movement in non-Seiko watches as soon as they release it to the public under their NH brand.

Why I want an 80 hour power reserve watch

The norm for automatic watches is 40 hours power reserve. That is a little over a day and a half.

This in my mind is too short. It means a watch needs to be worn daily in order to be charged, without needing the time to be set again when worn.

This is fine if you only ever wear one watch. Of the watch industry for automatic watches wants me to buy more of their products then a longer power reserve is needed.

I have a 40 hour power reserve dress watch that I used for work. But on weekends it is too formal with my casual clothes. So I have a second watch (a diver watch) to accessorize with my wardrobe. but by the time I comes Monday my work watch has stopped and I have to set the time again.

If I had an 80 hour power reserve dress watch I could come back after the weekend without having to reset the watch. This is why the Powermatic 80 by Tissot is so attractive, especially the Gentleman. To me this is the ideal work watch. Simple, dressy, practical.

Of course, I could just get a quartz watch and never worry about setting the time for years but that wouldn’t be fun at all. There is no romance to that.

Non-self, bundles, non-ownership, selflessness

Buddhism rejects the self and accepts a notion of non-self. It preceded bundle theory and no-ownership theory, which is in some way a formulation of this.

Hume pushed the bundle theory but could not understand what is there if it were only experiences. What he seem to left out is memory.

The self is just a collection of this matter-related memories. In this way, it does not go against the principles of one being “created” by the environment. A person is not independent of the place and time he or she is at or in. She or he is a product of it.

Property is theft, said Proudhon. Self-property is to steal and rob from the world of what you could contribute to it. That could be rightly called selfishness. To act without being the owner of the spirit is selflessness.

Mind and consciousness

The philosophy of mind seeks to answer such questions as: is mind distinct from matter? Can we define what it is to be conscious, and can we give principled reasons for deciding whether other creatures are conscious, or whether machines might be made so that they are conscious? What are thinking, feeling, experience, remembering? Is it useful to divide the functions of the mind up, separating memory from intelligence, or rationality from sentiment, or do mental functions form an integrated whole?

Flew and Priest

The first two questions brings up important concepts – mind and conscious(ness). the first question seems to assume that the mind is already is some kind of existent object. The second question assumes also to be conscious is a state that can be had or not had. And by the act of reification one can either own or not own consciousness, again assuming consciousness is a kind of object. The worst case scenario is that language forces us to talk and think about mind and consciousness as objects because language frames them as such. The third question is more interesting, trying to answer the nature of thought, emotions and experience. The fourth question is about the categories of the contents of thought.

For me, the study of mind must start with the question of the mind’s ontological status, the question of its existence or non-existence. This is true of consciousness as well. If it does then how is it different to existent matter. And if it does not then how do we account for it.

The dominant philosophies of mind in the current western tradition include varieties of physicalism and functionalism. For particular topics see also cognition, emotion, language, memory, mind-body problem.

Flew and Priest

I am tend to the physicalist position here. I kind of disagree with functionalism because the questions they ask tend to assume an existent mind while ignoring the embodied aspect of the mind. In other words, the philosophy of mind should, in my opinion, be relabeled as the philosophy of brain.